In Nature All Things Must Follow an Order, Even Viruses. Why Was This Not Observed With Treating SARS-CoV-2?

“After all, if we can live through the massive fear campaign for contamination, we can sure handle receiving the truth.”

We try to complicate matters but nature is not that complicated when you understand the science of natural law or the patterns of function. We have survived for many millennia with viruses: it is estimated that humanity has 380 trillion viruses within and outside the human body. If this is the case, why did we change everything with the discovery of SARS-CoV-2 that had worked in the past? In the midst of a pandemic don’t you think it is irresponsible to try to introduce an experimental treatment while the virus is still active and changing its DNA? It would have been much better to allow the virus to run its course, while protecting the most vulnerable, than to place the entire global population into a petri dish for observation and discovery.

We must understand the origins of viruses

Viruses are quite diverse. Unlike all other biological entities, some of them (like poliovirus) have RNA genomes and some (like herpesvirus) have DNA genomes. Further, some viruses (like influenza virus) have single-stranded genomes, while others (like smallpox) have double-stranded genomes. Viruses, do, however, share a few features, e.g. that they can replicate only within a host cell. We also know that no known virus contains ribosomes, the necessary component of a cell’s protein-making translational machinery.[1]

If viruses don’t contain ribosomes, then why would you use an experimental mRNA-ribonucleic acid as possible treatment? According to Lynne Maquat, scientist from the University of Rochester, who studies the RNA of viruses “understanding RNA structure and function helps us understand how to throw a therapeutic wrench into what the COVID-19 RNA does—make new virus that can infect more of our cells and also the cells of other human beings.”[2] My question is this: what if you get the genetic sequences wrong? “Once the virus is in our cells, the entire process of infection and re-infection depends on the viral RNA,” Maquat says.[3] Scary stuff to be experimenting with on a global scale wouldn’t you say?

Protection and the inconsistencies

But we must protect ourselves somehow, you might say. What about the masks then—aren’t they useful? Let’s take a look at some math. Viruses are quite small, with a diameter of less than 125 nanometers (nm) or (0.125 microns) but their range is between 0.06 and 0.14 microns. Now here are the numbers for the N95 mask filters: they are down to 0.3 microns which means that they block few, if any, virions (virus particles). With this in mind why would the media push the wearing of masks and let the people think they were protected when they knew perfectly well that they were ineffective in blocking the viral transmission of SARS-CoV-2?

COVID-19 rarely spreads through surfaces. They knew this at the beginning of the virus since this was not the first time the coronavirus was introduced into society—MERS and SARS were both from the same family. So why were we shown images of workers in hazmat suits spraying every possible surface, and people changing their work clothes before entering their own homes? They stated afterwards that the virus was airborne with very low viral transmission on surfaces and yet most stores and restaurants continue requesting hand sanitizers to be used while staff uses disinfectants on touch pads after every payment, wearing face masks, in an attempt to make healthy people believe they are all contaminated.

So who takes responsibility for all these claims? It seems that nobody does. Nature magazine, for example, tried to ask the CDC regarding the inconsistencies in its statements about the risks posed by fomites (clothes, surfaces) but the agency has not responded.

Have we also lost our minds in an attempt to blocking the existence of natural herd immunity and existing COVID-19 antibodies, why is that? Does it interfere with the business side of “health”?

What about natural immunity?

We know that natural herd immunity and COVID-19 (coronavirus) can be reached when enough people in the population have recovered from a disease and have developed protective antibodies against future infection. We can assume after living through SARS and MERS that a good percentage of people have natural antibodies for the Covid virus, although the strain of SARS-CoV-2 will be different in nature. Our adaptive immunity would respond and the recovery from infection would be much shorter for those with the natural antibodies than for those without.

An Israeli study revealed that natural immunity based on prior infection is considerably  better than 2 doses of the Covid mRNA vaccine. According to Science Magazine, the study found that “never-infected people who were vaccinated in January and February were, in June, July, and the first half of August, six to 13 times more likely to get infected than unvaccinated people who were previously infected with the coronavirus.”[4]

Tell me this: does it make any sense only to use PCR testing which has proven to be often false positive in many situations than to test the general public for natural immune antibodies for COVID-19? If they test for natural immunity, why on earth would they be shunned and overlooked, what possible reason would it do?

It would be nice to see those in public office to come clean. After all, if we can live through the massive fear campaign for contamination, we can sure handle receiving the truth. I always say follow the money, and in this case money and control go hand in hand. What do you think?

At the end it all comes down to one truth: if we don’t work proactively to become and stay healthy, if we don’t change our lifestyle in a way that is full of healthy foods, good amount of sleep and movement, quality supplements and as low of a stress level as possible, no amount of hand sanitizers, face masks and PCR tests is going to save us. The emphasis should be on healing, it should be about taking care of the root of a problem, and not about covering up its results.

Prevention Protocol for COVID-19:


[1] Wessner, David R. 2010.

[2] University of Rochester. 2020.

[3] ibid.

[4] Arutz Sheva Staff. 2021.