There Are No Drugs Produced Without Multiple Side Effects

 

“The originating medicine for thousands of years is now classified as unscientific medicine and now we are told to trust the science. Isn’t that just wishful thinking?”

 

As a society we are living longer today than in past generations. Longevity into the 90’s is now becoming commonplace in most industrialized societies. What is the cost? Are we simply delaying degenerative diseases and feeding pharmaceutical interests? If so, will the quality of life have a massive impact on a healthcare system already in dire need? We know what is upon us: disease is proliferating globally at a rapid pace. Today our God given natural immunity has been replaced by one delivered in a syringe and society is at the point of becoming wards of the pharmaceutical industry. To those affected, it will mean hardships through dependency. A great business strategy in selling sickness are double ending profits without competition—the perfect marriage of corporate sponsorship and pharmaceutical companies while supported by doctors and the health care system.

The idea for this newsletter came to me by chance seeing the heading Repeated Acetaminophen Use May Not Be as Safe as Previously Thought. Acetaminophen is the active ingredient in Tylenol, which is called paracetamol in several other countries.

I have never been under the illusion that out of the blue a massively popular pain killer like Tylenol could be discovered to cause health issues, especially since its sales are 25 billion doses per year and it has been in the marketplace since 1955 by McNeil Laboratories, Inc. (now part of the Johnson & Johnson pharmaceutical conglomerate). Yet, after sixty-nine years and hundred of billion of doses later, it appears that someone had an epiphany: a novel idea to question if the continued use of drugs like Tylenol could have side effects. Of course, we know that there is not a drug made that does not have side effects.

“Due to its perceived safety, paracetamol has long been recommended as the first line drug treatment for osteoarthritis by many treatment guidelines, especially in older people who are at higher risk of drug-related complications.”[1] Now the finding show that “[p]rolonged usage of acetaminophen was associated with a higher risk of developing heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and peptic ulcers, or a type of ulcer that affects the lining of the upper part of the small intestine and stomach.”[2]

Recent studies have raised concerns about the safety of regular acetaminophen use, with research from the University of California, Davis, finding that safe doses (500 mg/day) altered heart tissue proteins in mice, impacting pathways linked to energy production, antioxidant use, and damaged protein breakdown. Researchers highlighted potential heart risks, such as increased oxidative stress and toxin production, urging minimal use of the drug. Another 2022 study published in Circulation observed a 5-point average rise in blood pressure among people taking 1,000 mg of acetaminophen four times daily, the maximum recommended dose, over two weeks. Experts, including those from the University of Nottingham, caution that despite its reputation for safety, acetaminophen’s limited effectiveness and potential complications warrant re-evaluation of its widespread use for chronic conditions.

The April study was conducted on mice given acetaminophen and showed changes in the protein levels that are associated with “biochemical pathways involved in a range of functions, such as energy production, antioxidant usage and the breakdown of damaged proteins,” according to a news release. “We expected two to three pathways to be altered, but we found over 20 different signaling pathways being affected,” said Gabriela Rivera, the study’s first author and a doctoral student working in the laboratory of Aldrin Gomes, PhD, at the University of California, Davis.[3]

OK, one drug with side effects that is not so bad; let’s dig a little deeper. According to Jessica Blackburn, and William Ferguson from Wake Forest University, a typical human body’s cells make about 7,000 different types of protein molecules and are most frequent targets of drugs. Researchers have identified millions of proteins and are uncovering new ones at an unprecedented pace. However, a major challenge in developing improved drugs lies in the fact that two proteins with similar structures or genetic sequences can respond very differently to the same chemical compound. This variability can result in adverse drug reactions, which may range from mild discomfort to life-threatening complications. Each year, more than three million serious adverse reactions to prescription medications are reported. “There are more than 100,000 deaths from these reactions per year, placing prescription drug use as the fourth leading cause of death in the United States, ahead of pulmonary disease, diabetes, AIDS and pneumonia.”[4]

The fourth leading cause of disease. Actually “adverse prescription drug effects and other medical errors are the third leading cause of death in America. Adverse drug events harm 2.7 million hospitalized patients in the U.S. annually, with over 106,000 deaths and that’s just for hospitalized patients. Another 350,000 adverse drug events occur in U.S. nursing homes each year. And believe it or not, by most estimates, only 1-10% of adverse events are ever reported.”[5] So how much blood does the medical mafia have on their hands?

Prevention programs—when functioning properly—could help to reduce the number of drug-related deaths and lower the rate of public drug use. Unfortunately, this is not always true. Medicines proven to treat opioid addiction could be another alternative but as the news show, they remain vastly underused. “Only a fraction of the estimated 2 million people addicted to opioids are getting the medications, according to a report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine.”[6] One of the reasons—again—is the lack of proper training in the education of doctors, nurses and social workers. So how are we planning to solve the problem? Without the focus on proper treatment and rehabilitation, the crisis will remain a crisis, and this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Now we are learning about the side effects from Covid, like turbo cancers. Prof. Angus Dalgleish—the person behind the discovery of the CD4 receptor—has raised serious concerns about mRNA-based gene therapy, particularly its potential to exacerbate cancer. He recounted cases of patients whose previously stable cancers aggressively returned after receiving booster shots, including three personal friends, two of whom tragically passed away when treatments failed. Dalgleish describes these outcomes as “criminal negligence,” criticizing the use of mRNA platforms in infectious disease. As a retired oncologist, he and other similarly positioned colleagues have begun speaking out freely, advocating for a complete halt to mRNA gene therapy, which they believe may be causing more harm than good.

We are told to trust the science but isn’t that just wishful thinking? How can you put your trust in a system that vilifies natural medicine and refers to them as snake oil? You should be giving the body what it needs and use e.g. vitamin K, fish oil or natural treatments for treating UTIs instead of antibiotics, hormone free Thyroid Gland instead of synthetic drugs like Synthroid or, to treat your pain, DLPA instead of Tylenol. The originating medicine for thousands of years is now classified as unscientific medicine. Rockefeller did a good job in twisting the minds of politicians in expanding his fossil fuel from the oil industry and putting it into prescription drugs and synthetic chemical supplements filling the shelves in most health food stores and own by pharmaceutical interests. I call these companies Pharmalite and I trust them as far as I can throw them for treating my health and perhaps you should not either.

 

References:

[1] Phillips, Jack. 2024.

[2] Ibid.

[3] American Physiological Society. 2024.

[4] Blackburn, Jessica and Ferguson, William. 2013.

[5] RisCassi & Davis P.C. 2022.

[6] Perrone, Matthew. 2019.