Site icon Life Choice Ltd.

Looking Back: Examining the Inconsistencies 

Looking Back: Examining the Inconsistencies

“Confusion remains an underlying message, laced with a touch of truth while being contradicted over and over by those in authority.”

What we know: social distancing was completely unnecessary, neither the World Health Organization (WHO) nor the government can be trusted, and they do not have our best wishes in mind. What would the situation with long-term care and seniors’ homes be if another virus is declared a global emergency? Now that MRNA seems to be the new jab of choice, what do we do with all the faults Pfizer and Moderna admitted? The jab does not stay in the injection site and the RNA also has DNA which changes humanities genetic makeup.

There are many questions and way too many leading half-answers—there are multiple inconsistencies and many lawsuits being laid and won. It is the bare faced lies which leads to even more questions.

Social distancing was ineffective. One expert who doubts the relevance is Josef Buttigieg from the University of Regina, who specializes in neurobiology and stem cell physiology. In his Facebook post Buttigieg speaks about the importance of antibody tests mostly for the reason that “the outcome of this test is going to show that the vast majority of the population has already had the virus, meaning that social isolation is 1) not necessary and 2) didn’t work as well as we thought it would.” According to a scientific brief the World Health Organization, the presence of coronavirus antibodies may not protect against future infections, how can they be certain? “There is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection.” The question becomes, then, what good was the vaccine?

Herd immunity was an integral part of keeping a societies immune system strong. With Covid (or I should say with the business objective of Covid) it somehow fell out of favour. It is still taught in the medical books as an important element in the balance between the host population and the micro-organism, and represents the degree to which the community is susceptible or not to an infectious disease as a result of members of the population having acquired active immunity from either previous infection or prophylactic immunization.

It is not only the WHO that might appear questionable. Remember, Health Canada gave a time-limited approval of technical-grade ethanol (which contains acetaldehyde, a possible carcinogen) to be used in hand sanitizers. Since June 2020, Health Canada has recalled more than 200 hand sanitizers and the list keeps growing.

We can clearly see the mixed messages in how our Canadian government passed a law without democratic process – which is horrifying to the majority of Canadians. Prime Minister Trudeau previously said he admires China’s dictatorship. As a leader of a democratic country, how can he admire China with its human rights violations?

The practices of forcing self-isolation on the healthy and leaving the elderly unprotected should never be forgotten. Statistics proved that 79% of COVID-19 deaths were in nursing homes and remainder mainly associated with pre-existing health conditions, healthy people were not dying.

An April 22 study published in JAMA describing the outcomes for 5,700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area reported that “mortality rates for those who received mechanical ventilation in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups were 76.4% and 97.2%, respectively. Mortality rates for those in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups who did not receive mechanical ventilation were 19.8% and 26.6%, respectively. There were no deaths in the younger-than-18 age group.”

According to Luciano Gattinoni, a world-renowned Italian intensive care specialist, COVID-19 patients, like those suffering from Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), have below-normal levels of oxygen in their blood, which leads to breathing problems. In ARDS cases the lungs lose their elasticity. But in many cases of COVID-19, the lungs remain elastic and people are able to continue breathing for some time despite the low oxygen levels.

This “remarkable combination is almost never seen in severe ARDS,” he writes, adding that patients with normal looking lungs but low oxygen are at risk of lung injury from the ventilators, where pressure from the air damages the thin air sacs that exchange oxygen with the blood.  In Gattinoni’s study, only 20% to 30% of patients fully fit the severe ARDS criteria.[1]

It seems that medical interventions motivated by pharmaceutical interests are bad for your health. Is there any wonder why properly prescribed medicine is the leading cause of death?

Confusion remains an underlying message, laced with a touch of truth while being contradicted over and over by those in authority. Like a multi-arm octopus, many groups benefit from human catastrophes. The question remains: at what cost and will there be any retribution? In retrospect, we should be able to navigate what has transpired if you use critical thinking and, of course, break the addiction to legacy media. To get a straight answer the truth remains nebulous, there is so much at stake and it is uncertain who to believe. We can discern motive and we can question, keeping in mind “that the greatest of lies is the one closest to the truth.”

References:

[1] Williams, Megan. 2020.

Exit mobile version